DOMINANCE AND THE SOFT CLOAK
OF FEMININITY
Whenever I read stories of how the
women in some couples physically
dominate their men because they're literally stronger or more
physically aggressive, I have to smile. The same holds true for those
stories in which the female seems to verbally command respect by her
harshness or sternness. I smile for two reasons. It's super sexy that a
woman can do this and elicit a positive response from her partner.
And... I smile because I try to imagine it working for me or even
wanting it to work for me.
My Rook is 6'3, a sturdy but not
heavy man, belted in three different martial arts and he plays with
swords for fun (he fences). I'm 5'3 if I stretch, soft-spoken, and
could not step on a spider unless some poor child needed rescuing.
Outside of role play, I'll never forcibly dominate him with physical
strength unless I catch him snoozing or use a weapon :) (Neither of
which would I ever do.) Of course, I can simply tell
him to submit to anything within his limits and he will acquiesce, but
there's a different nuance there when compared to what I've described
above.
I mention this not to qualify or justify my relationship
in comparison to those that differ. Rather, my desire is to offer this
alternative point of view to those women who might consider dominating
their spouses were it not for the belief that dominance could never be
achieved by them because they lack physical strength and the capacity
for harshness, or because they feel dominance cannot be a loving,
feminine act. While the women in the first scenario most certainly can
and I'm sure do retain their own defined loving femininity, I think
that style probably isn't something with which a lot of non-lifestyle
women can identify. At least, I couldn't.
"GET DOWN OF YOUR
KNEES, BOY!" barked as she stands over him in six inch stilettos and
cracks a whip. A whip that will soon graze his back while she strikes
his submissive heart with humiliating remarks. I've read this scenario
so many times and I know that it works well for many. My own style is a
bit different - as yours might be.
A simple moment of tiptoeing
and whispering softly in his ear while my hand tenderly caresses his
cheek, "Wouldn't it feel lovely to be down on your knees for me.. eager
to do whatever I wish, knowing that it pleases me so very much?" has
not once failed to bring my man to his knees nor has it failed to
visibly excite him. Yes, I use my femininity and my sexuality to
control him just like other dominant women. He does what I want, when I
want, no matter what I'm wearing or what I say and do. When you're on
the outside looking in, the way in which we do things as a couple may
appear very different from than that of others, but it's really not.
Control is control. Surrender is surrender. The rest is quite simply
the cloak.
Please don't misunderstand, I didn't choose the cloak
of soft femininity because I had no choice or because I don't have the
"guts" to do otherwise. And, that needn't be the case for you should
you hold similar feelings. I could have chosen a shorter, slighter man
and/or changed my manner of speaking. I didn't want to. I'm not
interested in inflicting anything other than mild erotic pain and mild
just-enough-to-make-him-squirm-in-delight humiliation. I love things
(and me) this way. It feels natural and fulfilling to me and I know he
feels the same. We've donned the cloak that works for us just as you
can don the cloak that works for you and yours. Do what makes you feel
sexy, self-confident, and loved. That, in my opinion, is the surest way
to guarantee success in a power-exchange relationship.
Questions
or comments regarding this site should be sent to the Web
Mistress
Page Updated 11/03/07