Lady Julia's Erotic Hypnosis Femdom World


THIS IS AN ADULT CONTENT SITE

IF YOU FIND VIEWING FETISH OR BDSM MATERIAL OFFENSIVE OR IF YOU ARE NOT
21 OR OLDER, LEAVE NOW. BY REMAINING AND VIEWING THE CONTENT ON THIS
SITE YOU ARE VERIFYING YOU AGREE WITH SITE'S TERMS OF USE.


"Being dominant isn't determined by how you control, it's quite simply that you do control." ~ Lady Julia

Main Page of My Erotic Hypnotic Femdom Site

Monday, November 19, 2007

When Privacy Doesn't Really Mean Privacy


Last week Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of US national intelligence, made a very disconcerting assertion.
Privacy no longer can mean anonymity. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information. - CNN
Trust the government - your information will be safe in their hands. Don't be even the slightest bit concerned that these are the people who have in the past taken private information and conducted witch hunts like the McCarthy hearings. Don't worry your little head over the fact that the government is also responsible for holding people in GITMO for years without access to an attorney, without a trial, and for some allegedly without even being apprised of the charges against them. It's all for national security. Doesn't matter that they were wrong in some cases (and with the McCarthy hearings in many cases), doesn't matter that we have this little thing call the Bill of Rights, doesn't matter that we have a mechanism in place called the Judicial System to deal with issues like this. We can't trust the Judicial System to do the right thing. We can only trust Big Brother. Big Brother and businesses.

Trust businesses. I think we all know that big business has one concern - big business. If we believe big business will protect our privacy to the detriment of their bottom line... oh come on. Sure they will. Think about how the oil companies don't engage in price gouging to the tune of billions and billions. Consider how insurance companies always pay out readily and easily for legitimate health care claims even though it means they won't make billions in profit each year. Above all, never worry that businesses will lose your very private information. It never happens. For that matter it never happens that the government loses private information either. I could go on and on listing the reasons we should trust businesses but I think we all know exactly how much we can trust them to always put us first.

Just in case you are one of those people who think you can't trust the government or big business, Kerr did offer another thought to consider.
Kerr said at an October intelligence conference in San Antonio, Texas, that he finds it odd that some would be concerned that the government may be listening in when people are "perfectly willing for a green-card holder at an [Internet service provider] who may or may have not have been an illegal entrant to the United States to handle their data." - CNN
Since illegal immigration is a hot button for a lot of people especially in the border states, I suppose he thought this might garner some support from the few people who heard that remark and didn't think, "huh??" Let's not even discuss the racial implications of his statement.

Still concerned in spite of Kerr's well reasoned remarks? Consider this:
"Protecting anonymity isn't a fight that can be won," Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, said in a speech last month at an intelligence conference, the contents of which only now have come to light. "Anyone that's typed in their name on Google understands that." - LA Times
Try Googling yourself. Unless you're a relatively famous person, just how much stuff is there out there about you that you didn't put out there yourself? I write tons of things to post on the internet under this pseudonym, but there is nothing - not one thing - that shows up on a Google search of my real name except for the things I put there. I realize this isn't true for everyone, but how much information of concern can be Googled about you?

I will agree it is true that we have less privacy now than we did in the past, but at least we can rest assured that our private thoughts and private comments to others aren't out there for the world or the government to see unless we want them to see it.

The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco.

Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action suit, claims there are as many as 20 such sites in the U.S. - CNN

By now you may be wondering what has prompted Kerr's completely logical remarks.
As Congress debates new rules for government eavesdropping, a top intelligence official says it is time that people in the United States changed their definition of privacy. Kerr's comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Congressional leaders hope to finish the bill by Thanksgiving. It would replace the FISA update enacted in August that privacy groups and civil libertarians say allows the government to read Americans' e-mails and listen to their phone calls without court oversight. - AP

I've discussed all this with several people now and I've been a little surprised at one of the more common responses. "I have nothing to hide so why should I care?"

We may feel we have nothing to hide today. How do we know that the things we do, the things we value, or the things we believe won't be something we have to hide in the future? What's "acceptable" changes. Additionally,
Privacy from government is the most important privacy of all. It's essential for a free society. - Atu XVIII
If we are to be truly free, we must feel safe in being nonconformists both politically and/or personally. If we can not be assured of privacy from the government then how can we be assured we won't be persecuted or prosecuted for our nonconformity? How would we ever be able to safely stand up to the government if we felt the government was getting out of control? Surely the government would never reach a point where it was out of control?

I believe anyone who lives or desires to live an alternative lifestyle should be concerned about this issue. How do we know that one day our behavior will not just be deemed "perverted" by some but deemed illegal by the government as well?

For those of us who are concerned about the erosion of our right to privacy, perhaps now - while the bill is being written - is the time to act by contacting our Congress Persons and sharing our thoughts on this issue.

Labels: ,

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Bangladesh Cyclone Death Toll May Hit 15,000




Officials for aid agencies are estimating up to 15,000 people were killed in last week's cyclone in Bangladesh.

Already 3,000 bodies have been found.

An estimated 900,000 families have been affected.

In the worst affected areas 90 percent of homes and 95 percent of rice crops and valuable prawn farms were destroyed.

So many lives will never be the same. Please consider helping if you can.

Save the Children
International Red Cross and Red Crescent

Labels:

Friday, November 16, 2007

A Little Eye Candy From My Fav TV Programs


Ladies first of course ;) Above - Dennis Haysbert of The Unit. If you haven't seen this show, I suggest renting the first season and kicking back for a treat. The Unit is based on Delta Force, the special forces branch of the US Army. Suspense, intrigue, secret missions, and a view into the lives of the women who are married to such brave men. What's not to like? And Dennis Haysbert - he's luscious :) Strong, capable, decisive. Just what a leader should be. Pity he can't really be President like he was for a few seasons of 24.


I'm not certain but I think there aren't many people who wouldn't recognize Kiefer Sutherland as Jack Bauer from 24. Mr. Bauer is probably one of the most recognized characters on TV today and for a good reason. Who wouldn't want to watch a strong, capable, somewhat MacGuyver-like man who is always able to step in and save the day? Elizabeth if you are reading this, wouldn't it be lovely to find a photo of him on his knees? Yum.


Anyone who's been reading my blog for several months knows I am a Lost fan. There are few frivolous things that I consider "must do" in my life, but watching Lost at some point in the week is on my "must do" list. Above is Terry O'Quinn aka John Locke. Ladies, ladies, ladies. If you haven't seen Lost you can't appreciate the sexiness of this man. I admit I adore bald and balding men but it's more than that. There's just something about him.


Alright fellas, I've finally posted something to catch your eyes, haven't I? It's good to be patient ;) Above, Angeline Lilly looking very little like Kate Austen of Lost fame. What... you say you think she looks hotter this way? I must admit, I'm a bit surprised to hear that ;)

Last is the lovely Saffron Burrows of Boston Legal. Saffron as Lorraine Weller really is low on my list of the fabulous characters from this series, but I thought you fellows would prefer looking at her rather than James Spader or William Shatner ;) If you haven't seen Boston Legal you are missing absolutely the best show on TV in my opinion. It's well written, funny, and politically preachy in a way that makes you glad someone is taking a stand. Pick up the first season on DVD and see what you think!

Speaking of picking up DVDs of previous seasons, we may all be doing that soon. Thanks to the writers strike in Hollywood it's likely our favorite programs will be put on hold for awhile. I hadn't paid much attention to this strike other than to be irritated that Lost and 24 would probably be delayed in their January season premieres because of this. This apathy was short lived after I visited my friend RAB's blog yesterday. He's written a piece about the strike and offered a couple of videos made by the writers of The Daily Show. What an eye opener! Since I believe in supporting people who are wronged and these people are clearly wronged, I decided to write this entry today. Notice how I sweetly drew you in with eye candy though? ;)

Visit RAB's blog and take a look at that entry. I think it will move you to visit the unofficial WGAE blog and then perhaps to sign their petition. When I looked earlier over 50,000 people had signed to show their support. I for one and tired of seeing big business get away with things like this and was more than happy to support their cause.

Labels: