Lady Julia's Erotic Hypnosis Femdom World


THIS IS AN ADULT CONTENT SITE

IF YOU FIND VIEWING FETISH OR BDSM MATERIAL OFFENSIVE OR IF YOU ARE NOT
21 OR OLDER, LEAVE NOW. BY REMAINING AND VIEWING THE CONTENT ON THIS
SITE YOU ARE VERIFYING YOU AGREE WITH SITE'S TERMS OF USE.


"Being dominant isn't determined by how you control, it's quite simply that you do control." ~ Lady Julia

Main Page of My Erotic Hypnotic Femdom Site

Sunday, August 31, 2008

What If....



I was reading Unspeakable Axe's blog earlier (his blog is interesting - take a peek if you have time). In one of his entries he posed some thought provoking questions to himself and of course, subsequently stimulated those same questions in the minds of many of his readers.

What if there’s a choice between being really kinky and being with someone? What if the choice was being submissive and alone or being vanilla and with someone you adore? What if the choice was to act vanilla and not be alone or be true to myself and risk always being alone?
Perhaps this isn't the best time for me to ponder question - nevertheless I did. To answer this hypothetically seems almost impossible, yet many people make real life decisions about these questions every day.

I'm lucky - I realize that. As a Domme, it's unlikely I would have to sacrifice one for the other, but... hypothetically what would happen if I met someone who seemed perfect for me in every way except that he hadn't a kinky bone in his body? (Is there a man without a kinky bone in his body? Another interesting question.) Would I pursue the relationship? Right now of course I probably wouldn't even notice the guy existed but under different circumstances - well, I just don't know. The kink isn't massively important to me. I can go the rest of my life without cock collars, orgasm control, and bondage. I really enjoy those things but I could live without them. What I can't imagine changing is the need to be in control of certain aspects of my life and his including the sexual aspect. I doubt I could change being persuasive even if I tried. It happens without my thinking.

Is being dominant who I am or how I am? Perhaps semantics, but there seems to be a small difference there. The first seems to denote no choice, the second seems to infer there is one. I tend to think it's the first since I've been a bit bossy since I was ... oh... about five or six. I doubt one can change a behavior of 40 years.

Then I think... what if I were a submissive man? Would I choose being alone over being in a vanilla relationship if I were as submissive as I am actually dominant? I think I could go without the kink, but kink seems to be really important to kinky guys. I don't think I'd want to be alone - that desire to be adored is too strong in me. Still - if I were a submissive guy, would that desire to be adored be that strong? I think so - I think that's a really strong desire in most people, but.. who knows? I think if I were a submissive man I'd have to at least be with a woman who was a bit bossy.

Well... there. Six paragraphs of rambling and nary a conclusion or profound statement made. Just thinking and taking you along for the ride :) I'd love to hear your thoughts on the subject. If you're a blogger and you respond on your own blog, please let me know - I want to hear what you have to say.

Labels:

12 Comments:

At August 31, 2008 , Anonymous Anonymous 1 said...

Often when I read your posts I find myself wondering how you can continue to convince yourself that you are a Domme. Your post yesterday about Dommes and bitchiness is a perfect example. "I believe controlling someone by fear, condescension or intimidation is bullying, not dominating." Really? How many real Dommes like Elise Sutton, Lady Christine, Dominica, or Lady Lita do you think are cream puffs? They are condescending and intimidating by nature. They know how to put submissive men in their places.

Then you post something today saying "I can go the rest of my life without cock collars, orgasm control, and bondage." These are cornerstone activities for dominants and their submissives.

I'm sorry you're sad I really am but I think it's time someone was honest with you and told you the truth.

"Why *does* it say about a Domme when someone dumps her?" Since you asked I'll answer. It proves she's not much of a Domme.

 
At August 31, 2008 , Blogger web said...

First, I don't believe any of us mind being taken along for the ride, when You are the one doing the driving ;D

Second, I prefer not being alone. I believe that I could do without the kink, if that is what it tool. So far, I have not met a lady who was not at least a little kinky too, but unfortunately, more of them are submissive than are dominant. Seems that even the bossy in daily life tend to be submissive in the bedroom. Society may have something to to with that, but that is another discussion, LOL.

HUGS
web

 
At August 31, 2008 , Blogger Lady Julia said...

Ohhhh.... I get it, Anonymous 1. You're a member of the One True Way Club. Well why didn't you say so in the first place, sweetie? I mean - you never invited me to the meetings so how was I supposed to know I was doing it all wrong??? Shame on you for not inviting me you worthless little worm (did I do that right? I am trying you know...)

Just in case *you* didn't get it, I am not really calling you a worthless little worm. I was making a point, sweetie - did you catch it?

 
At August 31, 2008 , Blogger nigel said...

I think being true to oneself is most important. However I think my sexuality is just one part of my life and should not totally limit the growth of my character.

 
At August 31, 2008 , Blogger Robert said...

anonymous 1 isn't interested in discourse, but only in dropping bombs of nefarious intent. i say anonymous 1 is the phony.

Go back to your pay princess anon and tell her what miserable failure you've been since you've failed to accomplish anything with your feeble non-sense. Ask her why she is so threatened and intimidated by Lady Julia so as to send you on your worthless mission. The truth is, if you thought Lady Julia was not a Domme, you wouldn't be here.

Why do you think that condescending, bad behavior makes someone "real"? i say it makes them weak and pathetic. Any moron can act that way. Many of us have already dumped the ladies you mentioned and others like them in favor of someone genuine and classy. Even so, Lady Julia doesn't have to compare Herself to others to be a "real" Domme.

 
At September 01, 2008 , Blogger Kat's said...

Dear Anon #1.

My father used to relay something to my sisters and I periodically. He said, "It's better to stay silent and let the world believe you're a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it."

I'm sorry your father never taught you a similar lesson.

...

As for the other questions Lady J raises... Some submissive men don't really understand themselves prior to entering into long term relationships (such as marriage). Their wives, of course, have different ideas of where the relationship should go. And then the question becomes ...

Do you end the marriage in order to seek one that is more in tune with your submissive side?

I wouldn't do it that way, but I would understand if someone did. I guess it would depend on how miserable he was missing something that was important to him.

The thing is, it's not hard to find a woman who is happy to tell you what to do. What's hard is finding such a woman that you can also love.

 
At September 01, 2008 , Blogger Arafinwe Galadhon said...

Anonymous 1, you mentioned some people who you say are “real Dommes”. Two of those people have caused great harm to men by way of giving some really nasty hypnotic suggestions. Would you like to have splitting headaches every time you tried to listen to someone else? One of those you mentioned is not even a Domme at all, but a sub. No kidding.

What you don’t know about people is made very clear by your posts. One thing that you do know about people is that Lady Julia is gracious enough to publish your rude comments here right along with all the polite ones. Condescension and intimidation are not equal to strength. Never have been, never will be. Those are merely tools which in the hands of a weak person are an attempt to *appear* strong, but in the hands of a strong person are but some methods of actually doing it. To learn the difference can be wonderfully liberating. To never learn it can be terribly confining.

Good luck.

Arafin

 
At September 01, 2008 , Blogger unspeakable axe said...

Yeesh, Anonymous1 is...well.. I have a feeling he/she is the kind of person that has an unrealistic view of Dominant women.

I'm flattered you'd link to me:)

 
At September 02, 2008 , Anonymous lunarlens said...

I don't know why I feel the need to comment, but there is something about anonymous 1 that really gets to me. There are more ways to be a Domme than there are Dommes. To presume to say, "in order to be a Domme you must be thus," is just plain arrogant.

I think one proof that Lady Julia is indeed a Domme is that she is secure enough to allow comments like that one.

 
At September 02, 2008 , Blogger Lady Julia said...

Axe,

I'm flattered you're flattered ;)

You're writing is very interesting and I've enjoyed reading there.

 
At September 05, 2008 , Blogger Will said...

As you know, I'm married to a woman who is vanilla. I don't want to give her up for anything.

Will

 
At September 05, 2008 , Blogger Respectful said...

Thank you Goddess for allowing Lady Julia to stay home the day they hynotised the class at the One True Way Club.

I am always more respectful of a fine Lady, given a choice...

Respectful as always of Lady Julia.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home