Lady Julia's Erotic Hypnosis Femdom World


THIS IS AN ADULT CONTENT SITE

IF YOU FIND VIEWING FETISH OR BDSM MATERIAL OFFENSIVE OR IF YOU ARE NOT
21 OR OLDER, LEAVE NOW. BY REMAINING AND VIEWING THE CONTENT ON THIS
SITE YOU ARE VERIFYING YOU AGREE WITH SITE'S TERMS OF USE.


"Being dominant isn't determined by how you control, it's quite simply that you do control." ~ Lady Julia

Main Page of My Erotic Hypnotic Femdom Site

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Dan Asked...



1)Out of the Seven Deadly Sins,
which one, if you could, would you remove as a trait of mankind in the hopes that people would become much more unified and caring towards one another?

Without question it would be greed. I think greed has caused more death and anguish than just about anything except perhaps religion.

2)You have said that over the past year or so your sexuality and desires have become more diverse... Do you foresee a limit? And if so, do you imagine that that limit will get pushed further away just as your original limits did?

There are a few things I cannot ever imagine doing under any circumstances. Other than those few things, no, I don't really see a definite limit any more. If there's one thing I've learned in the past year it's to never say never when it comes to my sexuality. There are still plenty of things I don't see myself doing right now and *probably* ever - whipping someone until there are whelps or more, humiliating someone (worthless worm sort of thing), electricity play, breath play to name a few. However, if I found myself single again and a future partner was really, really turned on by these things, they're not as far out of reach as I at one time thought they were. I do believe those things would *only* appeal under that circumstance as they hold zero appeal to me now. These activities would be vehicles to controlling their physical pleasure and also mentally. That's what would make these activities appealing.

3)FUN Time... YOU wake up tomorrow and ALL chocolate is banned in the U.S.A! What do YOU do? LOL

Move!

4)Dreams, are they significant and relevant enough that one should try to interpret their meaning and use them to help govern their life OR are they just mumble jumble your subconscious mind goes through to "blow off steam" to cope with the "everyday" schtuffies in life?

Just my thoughts? yes and yes. Sometimes ;) Some dreams are pretty easy to interpret and I think they stand the best chance of meaning something. For example, sometimes when we're anxious or afraid we'll dream about something really scary but not necessarily the thing about which we are either anxious or afraid. Dreaming helps us relieve those pent up emotions. Most of the time I think our dreams are just our way of trying to rid ourselves of the things that are floating around in our subconscious - and not even necessarily significant things.

5)Internet blog "hecklers", ignore OR respond... which is the better way to deal with those types?

I'm sure the answer is to ignore them (as many of you have told me). Initially I didn't censor them because I just didn't like the idea of censoring. I like open discourse even if it means putting up with a few jerks. Lately I've begun to delete deliberately annoying comments for the most part. Rarely now I will print their comments because I think there may be others with the same question and I want to answer (for a couple different reasons). It's easy to misunderstand things especially in this medium so I try to give them the benefit of the doubt. Second, there are so many people out there without a clue and they generally are the ones who think things similar to the questions left by hecklers. It sometimes seems an opportunity to educate.

Hope my answers are clear. It's been a draining few days so if they aren't, ask :)

Labels:

5 Comments:

At April 05, 2007 , Anonymous Dan said...

Thank you for both the opportunity to interview you AND your answering of said interview.

I really have liked all the interaction from everyone. It's been sooo cool ;)

Dan

 
At April 05, 2007 , Blogger jmred said...

Lady Julia, I noticed the comment about religion being a cause of anguish for people. I try not to get too offended when someone says that, and I know why people say it. But I also think that it's off the mark. When religion hurts, or people do things to others to hurt, it's in the name of religion, not because it exists. People in power use often religion as a tool, but their motivations are the same as anyone else, greed being one of them. Most religions of the world, including the major ones, generally profess peace and equal treatment of people. Yes, there are sexist writings, and racist writings, but those are generally because of the culture in which these writings come from and not a doctrine of hate. I am sure many could come up with exceptions, but I am not interested in arguing that. I am speaking here in generalities. People pervert things. As much as religion is used as a tool for hate, it is also used as a basis for human morality as much if not more so. I see examples of this every day. As with everything humans touch, you take the good with the bad. Anyway, if you don't feel like posting this here, feel free to comment on my blog about it. Maybe this isn't the place to start this discussion.

J

 
At April 05, 2007 , Blogger Lady Julia said...

I didn't say religion caused *only* death and anguish but most certainly it has caused its share (the Crusades being the first thing to comes to my mind and then of course many of the problems in the Middle East. That's just a couple of examples.)

Religion is a big comfort to so many (me included, by the way) and there are many many good, kind, loving religious people who do wonderful things for others. I live in the Bible Belt in the US so I see that first hand.

I fully realize that many of the problems stemming from religion are caused by those on the extreme ends. I meant no offense to anyone.

 
At April 08, 2007 , Blogger jmred said...

I am glad you feel that way. I guess when you put it down as part of an answer to a question about which of the seven deadly sins is worse, I immediately think you are anti religion. Certainly wars in the name of religion go back a long way. But my main point was that imho, religion in these cases was used as a tool to get people to do violence in the name of god. If you look at the core teachings of the major faiths, they don't teach hate the way these religious fanatics claim. Anyway, I am sorry I misinterpreted that statement. Clearly I read more into the context of the question and statement than you meant.

J

 
At April 09, 2007 , Blogger Lady Julia said...

No apology is necessary. Respectful discussion is always welcome here.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home