Lady Julia's Erotic Hypnosis Femdom World


THIS IS AN ADULT CONTENT SITE

IF YOU FIND VIEWING FETISH OR BDSM MATERIAL OFFENSIVE OR IF YOU ARE NOT
21 OR OLDER, LEAVE NOW. BY REMAINING AND VIEWING THE CONTENT ON THIS
SITE YOU ARE VERIFYING YOU AGREE WITH SITE'S TERMS OF USE.


"Being dominant isn't determined by how you control, it's quite simply that you do control." ~ Lady Julia

Main Page of My Erotic Hypnotic Femdom Site

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Respect


My inbox often contains a fairly large number of emails from people who are new to the concept of dominance and submission. What a wonderful place to be - poised, eager to delve into an exploration of something so wonderful...so exciting... so powerful. Thanks to the vast array of misconceptions perpetuated by the residents of BDSM FantasyLand it can also be a somewhat scary place in some respects. You may have heard of this place - the land where submissives have no rights and Mistresses are always cold-hearted, totally selfish bitches who have zero regard for the vermin who grovel at their feet.

Last week I received a letter from a man who for the past two years has been dating a woman who is naturally very aggressive and who possessed some very limited experience in "dominating" others. Initially he had been very excited because he felt she could be *the* dominant woman in his life - his Goddess. As their relationship evolved he found she frequently said very hurtful and/or humiliating statements to him and wasn't hesitant in the slightest to do so in front of others. Some may remark, "This is a the problem? Humiliation is a component of D/s relationships, right? Kneel before me you worthless pig!" While humiliation certainly is a component of some D/s relationships, it's a big limit for others. It was definitely a huge limit for this fella. Sadly, even though her remarks very much upset him and have slowly been eroding his self-esteem, he thought as a submissive he was required to accept any behavior this woman chose to exhibit. "It's her right because she's a Domme." They had not in two years time ever discussed his feelings about this nor had they ever addressed his limits.

I tried to explain to him that "submissive" is not synonymous with "doormat" and dominance does not mean possessing limitless control. Obviously I can't be sure what's really transpriing between them but I encouraged him to talk to her, all the while keeping a few things in mind. Consensual humiliation as a component of a D/s dynamic is one thing, total disregard for someone's feelings and limits is something altogether different. A submissive should never feel he/she has to accept something from a dominant because X is her right. I believe a dominant only has the right to exert his/her control within the parameters of agreed upon limits. Limits should always be negotiated at the outset in a D/s relationship and reviewed/adjusted periodically as the relationship develops.

So many are eager to experience this dynamic and the imbalance between the numbers of male submissives and female dominants is such that many may be tempted to accept a violation of limits in order to receive at least some of what they want or need. I'd encouraged anyone in this position to think long and hard before doing this. A healthy D/s dynamic requires that the submissive not only respect the dominant but that the dominant respect the submissive. Perhaps most importantly, the submissive must possess a healthy self-respect. Without it, the potential for injury and abuse is just too strong.

Labels:

7 Comments:

At November 14, 2006 , Anonymous robert said...

Thank You for writing with clarity a well considered, no-nonsense message on this topic.

To approach BDSM equipped with mutual respect and a basic understanding of consensually agreed upon boundaries, seems to me to be like that stitch in time that saves nine.

Open communication can allow for dynamic adjustments.

If having considered these things, a submissive elects to yield everything and chooses to have no boundaries, having thoughtfully and carefully chosen to do so with fully informed consent with someone he loves and fully trusts - do You still perceive a problem?

 
At November 15, 2006 , Blogger Nigel Morley said...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
At November 16, 2006 , Anonymous robert said...

With regard to respect in another vain, some socially incapable miscreant has treated SueWearsThePants with flagrant disrespect. And i have some thoughts for Sue.

"The Butterfly" was truly one of the most beautiful things I've ever read. It touched my soul. It also added dimension, definition and context too your relationship. And it is this intertwining of integrating D/s within a love relationship that is SO INTERESTING.

You didn't violate anyone or any rules of conduct. You have no reason to apologize. You didn't misrepresent yourself in any way. You did absolutely nothing wrong. On the contrary, You wrote something wonderful from your heart. You have a gift that way. But pernicious evil hates extraordinary beauty. And maybe an evil twisted person has had a hard life. But with all due respect to the great words of Longfellow (which i appreciate very much), so did Oprah.

i think that the screening and authorization function of the comments is necessary when comments are allowed because of the world we live in. But it is understandably an added burden on the blogger.

Allowing challenging comments is a fine tribute to freedom of speech and is noble. But freedom of speech isn't a concept that came about devoid of responsibility, cloaked in a cowardly form of anonymity. When someone violates the rights of others by throwing bombs and then hides behind anonymity, i believe their abusive comments warrant gracious excision at the discretion of the blog owner.

robert

 
At November 16, 2006 , Anonymous Richard said...

robert,

I used to be a much bigger fan of now boundaries than I am after two years in a relationship with someone that I love and trust.

You never know all possible contingencies.

Once she ordered me to do something that would've put me in the hospital. She had no way to know that the closet that she ordered me into might have nails coming up from the floor (turned out they did). I'd refused a safeword so I just yelled "safeword."

She felt pretty guilty even though she was innocent. But had I been injured her guilt could've been really horrible.

Likewise I gave her a list that included my very few hard limits.

The boundaries are as much for her as myself. Were she to accidentally damage me it might take her a very long time to recover.

Still I give her as much of myself as I possibly can.

 
At November 17, 2006 , Blogger Catwomanslair said...

Very well put and something that needs to be said. I am happy to see how the 'net has made D/s more accessible but the influx of people has also meant that a lot of people get involved without educating themselves about the basics. Basics including what to look for in a Domme/sub, safety issues, SSC or RACK and etiquette. It sounds liek the man you talked to was mistaking a domineering and callous woman for a Domme.

 
At November 18, 2006 , Anonymous dick said...

Dominant women choose the way they behave and it is up to their males to tolerate it. Real Dominas don't cower when their submissives whine. Capitulating makes both the Domina and the submissive weak.

 
At November 20, 2006 , Anonymous thomas said...

Dick you speak of fantasy views on D/s. In the real world dominant women and man admit when they are wrong, consider their partner's feelings, and respect their limits. Dominants are not perfect. They are in control because the submissive surrendered control, not because they are superior and have inalienable right to possess the submissive.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home